Getafe 1–1 Rayo Vallecano: how the model saw it
Getafe 1–1 Rayo Vallecano finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Getafe at 34%, and rated the actual result at 34%.
More →Getafe 1–1 Rayo Vallecano finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Getafe at 34%, and rated the actual result at 34%.
More →Monterrey 2–1 CF Pachuca finished with Monterrey winning. Our model had called it exactly: it published 2-1, a scoreline it rated at 9%.
More →Tottenham 3–1 Coventry finished with Tottenham winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 43%, though it expected 1-0 rather than 3–1.
More →Our model leans to Corinthians here, but not by much: 45% (fair odds 2.22) against 29% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Newell's Old Boys here, but not by much: 44% (fair odds 2.27) against 32% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Sarmiento Junin here, but not by much: 40% (fair odds 2.50) against 31% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Bayern München here, but not by much: 46% (fair odds 2.17) against 26% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Como here, but not by much: 50% (fair odds 2.00) against 24% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Real Betis here, but not by much: 47% (fair odds 2.13) against 23% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →AC Milan 3–2 Atalanta finished with AC Milan winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 42%, though it expected 1-0 rather than 3–2.
More →Leeds 1–1 Manchester United finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Manchester United at 39%, and rated the actual result at 27%.
More →Leon 3–5 Club America finished with Club America winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 44%, though it expected 1-2 rather than 3–5.
More →Sao Paulo 1–0 Vasco da Gama finished with Sao Paulo winning. Our model had called it exactly: it published 1-0, a scoreline it rated at 12%.
More →Our model leans to Flamengo here, but not by much: 41% (fair odds 2.44) against 28% for the draw. Published scoreline: 0-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Belgrano Cordoba here, but not by much: 43% (fair odds 2.33) against 32% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Remo host RB Bragantino in a game our model cannot separate: 37% for the home side, 29% for the draw and 34% for the visitors.
More →Fenerbahçe host Slavia Praha in a game our model cannot separate: 42% for the home side, 24% for the draw and 34% for the visitors.
More →Our model leans to Manchester City here, but not by much: 56% (fair odds 1.79) against 23% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Paris Saint Germain host Barcelona in a game our model cannot separate: 41% for the home side, 24% for the draw and 35% for the visitors.
More →VfB Stuttgart host Atletico Madrid in a game our model cannot separate: 36% for the home side, 25% for the draw and 39% for the visitors.
More →