FC Juarez 0–1 Atlante FC: how the model saw it
FC Juarez 0–1 Atlante FC finished with Atlante FC winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 38%, though it expected 1-2 rather than 0–1.
More →FC Juarez 0–1 Atlante FC finished with Atlante FC winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 38%, though it expected 1-2 rather than 0–1.
More →Lille 2–4 Galatasaray finished with Galatasaray winning. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Lille at 50%, and rated the actual result at 25%.
More →Our model leans to Atletico Mineiro here, but not by much: 46% (fair odds 2.17) against 27% for the draw. Published scoreline: 0-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to FC Cincinnati here, but not by much: 51% (fair odds 1.96) against 22% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Llaneros host Deportivo Cali in a game our model cannot separate: 31% for the home side, 34% for the draw and 35% for the visitors.
More →Our model leans to Alaves here, but not by much: 59% (fair odds 1.69) against 24% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Ipswich host Nottingham Forest in a game our model cannot separate: 39% for the home side, 26% for the draw and 35% for the visitors.
More →Torino host Monza in a game our model cannot separate: 41% for the home side, 25% for the draw and 34% for the visitors.
More →Deportivo Pasto 0–1 Alianza Valledupar finished with Alianza Valledupar winning. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Deportivo Pasto at 45%, and rated the actual result at 26%.
More →Deportivo Riestra 1–1 Union Santa Fe finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Deportivo Riestra at 37%, and rated the actual result at 32%.
More →Fenerbahçe 2–2 Slavia Praha finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Fenerbahçe at 42%, and rated the actual result at 24%.
More →Sabah FA 1–2 Borussia Dortmund finished with Borussia Dortmund winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 43%, though it expected 0-1 rather than 1–2.
More →Our model leans to Atletico Nacional here, but not by much: 49% (fair odds 2.04) against 26% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-2, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Deportivo Pereira here, but not by much: 42% (fair odds 2.38) against 31% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Internacional de Bogota here, but not by much: 45% (fair odds 2.22) against 28% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →1899 Hoffenheim host Lyon in a game our model cannot separate: 36% for the home side, 27% for the draw and 37% for the visitors.
More →Our model leans to AC Milan here, but not by much: 41% (fair odds 2.44) against 27% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-2, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Omonia Nicosia host Benfica in a game our model cannot separate: 35% for the home side, 26% for the draw and 39% for the visitors.
More →Nottingham Forest 0–1 Arsenal finished with Arsenal winning. Our model had called it exactly: it published 0-1, a scoreline it rated at 14%.
More →Deportivo Cali 0–0 Junior finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Deportivo Cali at 48%, and rated the actual result at 30%.
More →