Rotherham
vs
Gillingham
League Two prediction
Our model says: Rotherham 1–0 Gillingham
The model makes it 41% Rotherham, 29% draw, 30% Gillingham — fair odds of 2.44, 3.45 and 3.33. Fair odds are simply 100 ÷ the probability; they are the model's own number, not a bookmaker's price.
Most likely scoreline: 1-0.
Expected goals: Rotherham 1.57, Gillingham 1.18.
Both teams to score: 55%. Over 2.5 goals: 52%, under 2.5: 48%.
Model confidence: Medium.
Published
Live win probability
From kick-offThese update every few seconds once the match kicks off, as the model re-reads the score, the clock and any red cards. The second figure is fair odds — 100 ÷ probability, the price with no margin in it.
Model insights: Rotherham vs Gillingham
Has the model earned this number?
It puts Rotherham at 41% here. Across 2837 settled matches, 1308 forecasts have landed in the 40–50% band; those outcomes actually happened 44.8% of the time, against an average forecast of 43.8%. In this range the two line up, so the figure above can be read literally.
Every settled prediction on this site is scored against an uninformed baseline, band by band, and published whether or not it flatters the model — see the full record.
Form going into Rotherham vs Gillingham
Rotherham
- W1-0away to Northampton19 September 2026
- D3-3Salford City12 September 2026
- L0-1away to Bristol Rovers5 September 2026
- D2-2away to Tranmere1 September 2026
- W2-1Chesterfield29 August 2026
Gillingham
- W3-0Bristol Rovers19 September 2026
- W2-0Tranmere12 September 2026
- W4-1away to Rochdale5 September 2026
- D1-1away to Chesterfield1 September 2026
- D1-1Northampton29 August 2026
What these results say
- Rotherham scored in 4 of these 5 matches.
- Rotherham conceded in 4 of these 5 matches.
- Gillingham went unbeaten through these 5 matches.
- Gillingham scored in every one of these 5 matches.
Up to 5 matches before kick-off, most recent first. The model works from each side's rolling expected-goals ratings rather than from these results directly, so read them as context — how the ratings are built.
League Two table
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Rotherham | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 4 | Gillingham | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 12 |
Where the two sides stand. Full table
Leading scorers: Rotherham and Gillingham
Rotherham
- P. Mullin3 goals
Gillingham
- J. Brophy3 goals
Top 3 by league goals this season. Player availability is not part of the model — injuries and suspensions are a planned improvement.
Two sides the ratings cannot separate
Rotherham carry a model rating of 6.14 against 6.09 for Gillingham. The scale is anchored so that an average side in one of Europe's big five leagues sits at 6.85, and it is adjusted for the strength of each team's league, so the two numbers are comparable even across borders.
A gap that small is inside the noise of the rating itself — treat the two as level.
What the model expects
Under the hood the model expects 1.57 goals for Rotherham and 1.18 for Gillingham. Those two numbers, not the scoreline, are what the model actually estimates; everything else is derived from them.
Rotherham rate 0.47 in attack and 1.95 in defence, where 1 is league average and a lower defensive number is better; Gillingham rate 0.50 and 2.30.
Where the model differs from the table
The table and the model disagree here: the standings favour Gillingham, while our numbers lean the other way. The model weights recent expected goals rather than results already banked, so it moves before the table does.
Across the rest of the season our simulation gives Rotherham a 2.3% chance of the title and Gillingham 5.7%, from 10000 simulated seasons.
How this was produced
Publicly tracked record so far: 1326 correct results out of 2837 settled predictions (47%), with 271 exact scorelines (10%). That log is updated automatically after every match and is never edited.
Full method: how the model works.
From the first whistle this page keeps going: the win probabilities at the top are recalculated as the match plays out, reading the score, the clock and any sendings-off. The same model, asked how many goals are left rather than how many there will be.
Team comparison
Bars show each side's share of the two-team total, based on the model's attack/defence ratings and expected goals for this fixture.
Why the model favours this side
The model gives Rotherham the highest probability at 41%, based on each side's rolling attack and defence ratings estimated from recent match data. The model projects 1.57 expected goals for Rotherham against 1.18 for Gillingham. Rotherham's attack/defence rating is 0.47/1.95 versus the league average (1.00 = average), compared with 0.5/2.3 for Gillingham.