League Tables

Eliteserien

The table as it stands, and where the model expects it to finish. Across all 87 settled predictions in this competition, it has called 53% of results. Projections are final positions, not qualification or relegation. How the model works. Upcoming predictions →

  1. Viking — 59 points from 24 played (19 won, 2 drawn, 3 lost), 62 scored, 23 conceded, goal difference +39. Form, oldest first: W W W W W.
  2. Bodo/Glimt — 56 points from 24 played (18 won, 2 drawn, 4 lost), 58 scored, 21 conceded, goal difference +37. Form, oldest first: W L W W L.
  3. Molde — 43 points from 24 played (13 won, 4 drawn, 7 lost), 57 scored, 36 conceded, goal difference +21. Form, oldest first: W L D W W.
  4. Rosenborg — 40 points from 24 played (12 won, 4 drawn, 8 lost), 46 scored, 31 conceded, goal difference +15. Form, oldest first: W W D W W.
  5. Tromso — 40 points from 24 played (11 won, 7 drawn, 6 lost), 43 scored, 34 conceded, goal difference +9. Form, oldest first: L W D D L.
  6. Lillestrom — 39 points from 24 played (12 won, 3 drawn, 9 lost), 35 scored, 33 conceded, goal difference +2. Form, oldest first: W L D W W.
  7. Sarpsborg 08 FF — 31 points from 24 played (8 won, 7 drawn, 9 lost), 30 scored, 35 conceded, goal difference -5. Form, oldest first: D L W L W.
  8. KFUM Oslo — 30 points from 24 played (8 won, 6 drawn, 10 lost), 30 scored, 39 conceded, goal difference -9. Form, oldest first: W W W D D.
  9. Brann — 29 points from 24 played (9 won, 2 drawn, 13 lost), 42 scored, 40 conceded, goal difference +2. Form, oldest first: L W L L L.
  10. Valerenga — 29 points from 24 played (8 won, 5 drawn, 11 lost), 39 scored, 46 conceded, goal difference -7. Form, oldest first: L D L W W.
  11. Fredrikstad — 29 points from 24 played (8 won, 5 drawn, 11 lost), 29 scored, 41 conceded, goal difference -12. Form, oldest first: D D D L L.
  12. Ham-Kam — 26 points from 24 played (7 won, 5 drawn, 12 lost), 33 scored, 51 conceded, goal difference -18. Form, oldest first: L L W L L.
  13. Sandefjord — 24 points from 24 played (6 won, 6 drawn, 12 lost), 22 scored, 31 conceded, goal difference -9. Form, oldest first: L W D L L.
  14. Aalesund — 24 points from 24 played (5 won, 9 drawn, 10 lost), 40 scored, 53 conceded, goal difference -13. Form, oldest first: L W L W L.
  15. Kristiansund BK — 20 points from 24 played (5 won, 5 drawn, 14 lost), 25 scored, 49 conceded, goal difference -24. Form, oldest first: L L L L D.
  16. Start — 19 points from 24 played (5 won, 4 drawn, 15 lost), 26 scored, 54 conceded, goal difference -28. Form, oldest first: W L L L W.

What moved

Measured against 2026-10-29, the last update whose numbers changed — not against the last time the page was built, because an unchanged projection is carried forward rather than restamped.

  • Aalesund — bottom-three risk down 0.1, to 48.8%.
  • Brann — bottom-three risk up 0.1, to 0.6%.
  • Kristiansund BK — bottom-three risk up 0.1, to 92.1%.
  • Start — bottom-three risk up 0.1, to 97%.

Season projection

Every one of the 48 matches this phase has left, played out 10,000 times by the same model that makes our match predictions — but rating each side on its whole season rather than its last six games, since one hot run should not decide a title race. The figures are final positions, not qualification or relegation: those depend on each country's rules and playoffs. A statistical estimate, not betting advice. These figures cover the regular season only. The regular season is not the end of the competition: Final follow it, and no projection here covers them. Movement is measured against 2026-10-29, the last update whose numbers changed.

  1. Viking — projected to finish on 70.8 points, from 59 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 70.7%, finishes top two 100%, bottom three 0%.
  2. Bodo/Glimt — projected to finish on 67.8 points, from 56 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 29.3%, finishes top two 100%, bottom three 0%.
  3. Rosenborg — projected to finish on 51.7 points, from 40 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 0%.
  4. Molde — projected to finish on 51.2 points, from 43 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 0%.
  5. Lillestrom — projected to finish on 48.9 points, from 39 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 0%.
  6. Tromso — projected to finish on 48.3 points, from 40 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 0%.
  7. Sarpsborg 08 FF — projected to finish on 39.3 points, from 31 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 0.2%.
  8. Brann — projected to finish on 38.7 points, from 29 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 0.6%.
  9. Valerenga — projected to finish on 37.1 points, from 29 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 1.7%.
  10. KFUM Oslo — projected to finish on 36.5 points, from 30 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 1.9%.
  11. Fredrikstad — projected to finish on 36.3 points, from 29 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 4.8%.
  12. Ham-Kam — projected to finish on 32.4 points, from 26 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 26.5%.
  13. Sandefjord — projected to finish on 32.2 points, from 24 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 26.6%.
  14. Aalesund — projected to finish on 30.4 points, from 24 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 48.8%.
  15. Kristiansund BK — projected to finish on 25.9 points, from 20 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 92.1%.
  16. Start — projected to finish on 24.6 points, from 19 after 24 played. Finishes top of the regular season 0%, finishes top two 0%, bottom three 97%.

Top scorers

  1. P. Christiansen (Viking) — 15 goals, 7 assists.
  2. Amin Chiakha (Rosenborg) — 15 goals, 4 assists.
  3. A. Helmersen (Bodo/Glimt) — 12 goals, 1 assist.
  4. L. Alvheim (Kristiansund BK) — 12 goals.
  5. K. Lonebu (Molde) — 12 goals, 2 assists.
  6. L. Haren (Valerenga) — 11 goals, 2 assists.
  7. E. Breivik (Molde) — 10 goals, 10 assists.
  8. H. Larsen (Tromso) — 10 goals, 4 assists.
  9. M. Christensen (Aalesund) — 10 goals, 4 assists.
  10. S. Kvia-Egeskog (Viking) — 9 goals, 3 assists.
  11. Vá (Lillestrom) — 8 goals, 5 assists.
  12. E. Hestad (Molde) — 8 goals, 2 assists.
  13. N. Holm (Brann) — 7 goals, 3 assists.
  14. H. Heggheim (Viking) — 7 goals, 3 assists.
  15. J. Hjertø-Dahl (Tromso) — 7 goals, 2 assists.
  16. K. Høgh (Bodo/Glimt) — 7 goals, 4 assists.
  17. F. Gulbrandsen (Lillestrom) — 7 goals, 1 assist.
  18. B. Njie (KFUM Oslo) — 7 goals, 1 assist.
  19. D. Karlsbakk (Sarpsborg 08 FF) — 7 goals, 1 assist.
  20. E. Ceïde (Rosenborg) — 6 goals, 6 assists.

Eliteserien: how many points for the top two?

Chance by final points total · 30 October 2026

54 points has been enough in half of the simulations, 58 in nine out of ten.

The top two go into the Champions League qualifying zone.

fulltimestats.comBased on 10,000 simulations · 30 October 2026

Eliteserien: how many points to stay up?

Chance by final points total · 30 October 2026

30 points has been enough in half of the simulations, 32 in nine out of ten.

The bottom three are in the relegation zone.

fulltimestats.comBased on 10,000 simulations · 30 October 2026

Head-to-head records

Every recorded meeting between two Eliteserien clubs, won-drawn-lost from the first-named side. All head-to-head records.

Other competitions

All 95 competitions we cover.