Chico 1–1 Junior: model review
Chico 1–1 Junior finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Junior at 43%, and rated the actual result at 29%.
More →Chico 1–1 Junior finished with a draw. The model got this one wrong. It leaned to Junior at 43%, and rated the actual result at 29%.
More →Venezia 0–2 Inter finished with Inter winning. Our model had called it exactly: it published 0-2, a scoreline it rated at 13%.
More →Our model leans to Fluminense here, but not by much: 52% (fair odds 1.92) against 26% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →RB Bragantino go into this one as a clear favourite by our numbers: 60%, which is fair odds of 1.67. Our published scoreline is 2-0 — the likeliest exact score within that result rather than across the whole match — and the model gives Chapecoense 17% to win outright.
More →Our model leans to Palmeiras here, but not by much: 42% (fair odds 2.38) against 29% for the draw. Published scoreline: 0-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Lille here, but not by much: 46% (fair odds 2.17) against 27% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Rennes here, but not by much: 43% (fair odds 2.33) against 26% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-2, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →SV Elversberg host FSV Mainz 05 in a game our model cannot separate: 41% for the home side, 23% for the draw and 36% for the visitors.
More →Our model leans to Villarreal here, but not by much: 58% (fair odds 1.72) against 24% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Sevilla 2–0 Osasuna finished with Sevilla winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 53%, though it expected 2-1 rather than 2–0.
More →Hamburger SV 1–3 Eintracht Frankfurt finished with Eintracht Frankfurt winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 37%, though it expected 0-1 rather than 1–3.
More →Instituto Cordoba 1–0 Deportivo Riestra finished with Instituto Cordoba winning. Our model had called it exactly: it published 1-0, a scoreline it rated at 20%.
More →Santa Fe 2–1 Bucaramanga finished with Santa Fe winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 45%, though it expected 1-0 rather than 2–1.
More →Sassuolo 2–6 Lazio finished with Lazio winning. The model had the right result: it gave that outcome 51%, though it expected 1-2 rather than 2–6.
More →Our model leans to Argentinos Juniors here, but not by much: 51% (fair odds 1.96) against 27% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Ceara here, but not by much: 43% (fair odds 2.33) against 28% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Cucuta here, but not by much: 42% (fair odds 2.38) against 28% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-0, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Atletico Mineiro here, but not by much: 43% (fair odds 2.33) against 27% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Atalanta here, but not by much: 42% (fair odds 2.38) against 27% for the draw. Published scoreline: 1-2, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →Our model leans to Frosinone here, but not by much: 53% (fair odds 1.89) against 25% for the draw. Published scoreline: 2-1, the likeliest exact score within that result.
More →